“Shall we go watch Parineeta?”
“Are you sure we can make it?”
“Chal, jaldi jaate hain!”
Parineeta begins well enough. The opening shots give a nice view of Kolkata in our own Aby baby’s baritone. Isn’t it time we got others to do voice-overs? That gravelly tone is kinda overdone, I feel. Om Puri, Prashant Nambiar, Suresh Oberoi… come on, give the big B a break. Anyways, then on the film tends to drag a bit. Pradeep Sarkar has roped in some very familiar faces. I think many of them have featured in his Euphoria videos. Most of them act as if they are on stage; the loud tones, the exaggerated expressions etc. On one level, the film reminds me of Devdas. The protagonist: arrogant, somewhat wimpish, stylish, artistic… spoilt! The villain of the piece, the hero’s Dad: pompous, small-minded, mean. The heroine: apple of everyone’s eye, the sarvajanik darling, the best cook, the nice girl, the childhood pal… Blah. Rekha does an olde-worlde night club number. Dia Mirza has a small and forgettable role. Vidya Balan looks like she has a background in classical dance; her expressions are that dramatic! The rolling eyes, the raised eyebrows… Chhota Nawab has done better work in the past. This film was so-so as far his performance was concerned. Sanjay Dutt has some element of normalcy in the film; the only guy who appears real! Rest everything is passe. Plus a blooper: The song Sar jo tera chakraye from Pyaasa wasn’t released in 1932, was it? I bet not!
If I hadn’t been there, Pinch would have walked out in the first half itself… The film was a disappointment.
Anonymous says:
will give it a miss
Thanks for the review. Now I can give it a miss as this is the 7th person telling me to go play basketball instead.
July 2, 2005 — 2:23 am
Anonymous says:
will give it a miss
sorry, didn’t leave my blog address in my comment.
http://poomanam.blogspot.com
July 2, 2005 — 2:24 am
Lakshmi says:
Re: will give it a miss
đŸ™‚
Your blog makes nice reading. You like ‘Coffee in Heaven’ too? I had posted it some months back…
July 2, 2005 — 6:03 am
rileen says:
The movie’s set in 1962, as far as i know.
July 2, 2005 — 3:49 am
Lakshmi says:
Oops… I thought that the first shot showed it as ‘Calcutta, 1932’. Nahin?
July 2, 2005 — 6:01 am
radhika74 says:
nahin:P!it is 1962.
July 2, 2005 — 6:22 am
lalunadiosa says:
I actually liked the movie….I do agree that like in Devdaas, the hero of this story seems like a spolit brat as well….but then again I think that the brats make for better story fodder esp. if the other person in the story is the sarvajanik darling (btw love this jargon!!!)….
July 2, 2005 — 7:49 am
Lakshmi says:
Actually I didn’t dislike the movie all that much… Just that when I started writing on what was NOT great about the film, it went on and on and on…:-)
July 2, 2005 — 5:56 pm
Anonymous says:
HI
HEY GUD REVIEW OF THE MOVIE…SHOULDA READ IT A FEW DAYS BACK WOULDNT HAVE WASTED THE MONEY ON THE MOVIE
U WRITE WELL..DONT THINK YOUR A MALAYALEE BASICALLY …
I M A MALLU FRM JAIPUR
IF U FIND TIME BROWSE THROUGH
http://nithinram.mindsay.com
keep up the gud work …
bye
nithin
July 6, 2005 — 4:33 pm
Lakshmi says:
Re: HI
Well, I am a Malayalee, like it or not…:-)
July 6, 2005 — 8:31 pm