Gone are the days when we used to watch to news on Doordarshan. Those days, there were charming newsreaders. I remember Amita Kohli, Minu Sanyal, Geetanjali Aiyar, Sangeeta Bedi, Sukanya Balakrishnan and others. News was plain, crisp and dispassionate. So also were the correspondents. If you compare them to their modern counterparts, you might even think that they were boring and dull. Of course, there were no other TV channels in those early to mid 1980s and we were quite satisfied. Since the last couple of years, Indian TV has been taken over by a host of news channels. News beams in 24/7 and there are multiple channels to choose from. I am not sure if it’s my plain imagination or a viewpoint that others share but there are some aspects to the latest breed of news programming in India that I simply don’t get.
For one, there is uncanny similarity between the programming style followed by these channels and that adopted by FOX news. Personally, I don’t like the FOX brand of news broadcasting. I sense a strong element of drama in everything they present. Loud headlines that come right into your face, rapidly moving tickers, use of certain words that I feel are unnecessarily hard-hitting, overly passionate and dramatic… sometimes, I feel that FOX presents its viewpoint in a way that maneouvres the opinions of the viewers in a subtle manner towards that presented on the screen. Well, maybe all news channels do that, covertly or overtly. My point is, the Indian news channels seem to be going the same way. There are ways and means to articulate and I think news networks have to be very sensitive to the impressions their viewers have. Words and thoughts are associated strongly in people’s minds and as a correspondent/news reporter, one should be extremely careful when one mentions anything on the screen. Countless viewers are tuned in from all over the world trying to get information and it is the responsibility of the news network to be aware of that and act responsibly. I noticed that the Indian correspondents used a lot of Hindi words that seemed very unnecessarily dramatic, even shocking. The tone is slightly high-pitched, giving that element of urgency to the delivery and they speak quite rapidly. They beam images that are quite graphic in nature and frankly speaking, we can do without seeing them. These pictures don’t really serve much than shocking the viewers, I think.
Secondly, why do the women broadcasters dress in Western formals? It is no big deal but I find it quite incongruous. Do they think that they won’t have a universal appeal unless they dress in such clothes? In any case, they speak in Hindi. Why can’t they dress in formal salwar kameezes or sarees? I am quite curious to know what is the reason behind this dress code.
megaswami says:
FOX news is the right hand of the devil. Rupert Murdoch definitely helped W score the 2000 election. You know something’s wrong when a news channel feels that it must TELL you that it provides only “fair and balanced news.”
July 12, 2006 — 1:55 pm
Lakshmi says:
🙂
July 12, 2006 — 9:22 pm
fugney says:
Was thinking quite the same thing actually. I’m afraid it’ll spawn (or has already spawned) a drama-hungry culture.
On western formals, well everyone wears them!
July 12, 2006 — 2:18 pm
Lakshmi says:
On western formals, well everyone wears them!
Is that a good reason? To me, it appears like they’re merely trying to model themselves on the news networks here and that only Western formals are regarded as *professional attire*.
July 12, 2006 — 9:24 pm
fugney says:
What I meant by “everyone” is “men as well as women”. On these channels, that is.
July 13, 2006 — 4:39 pm
Lakshmi says:
Somehow, men wearing formal shirts and ties still seems bearable considering we are used to it but women in trouser suits and that *pancake-make up* and ultra-straight hair – they look the stars in the Hindi soap operas!
July 13, 2006 — 7:22 pm
fugney says:
Uhhh.. do you watch any hindi soap operas? The ladies are dressed nothing like that.
July 14, 2006 — 1:08 pm
Lakshmi says:
I meant the makeup and hair, not the outfits.
July 14, 2006 — 9:22 pm
Lakshmi says:
Actually, her name used to appear as Minu but I came to know that Luku Sanyal, another TV personality is her mother.
July 12, 2006 — 9:25 pm
Anonymous says:
nuthin wrong with western formals. Besides, they do wear salwaars. Have seen barkha dutt et al many times to guarantee that. 🙂
Surprisingly , Prannoy Roy does not wear salwaars
Bharat
July 13, 2006 — 3:36 am
Lakshmi says:
Yes, I know that Barkha wears the ethnic look quite frequently…
July 13, 2006 — 7:23 pm
shri says:
I used to love Minu Sanyal! Her voice, her diction, it was perfect, IMO.
About Western formals, I don’t understand it either. All I can think of, when I see the newscasters in Western formals is, aren’t they feeling hot in that coat/jacket when it is a blistering hot summer outside?
July 13, 2006 — 3:04 pm
Lakshmi says:
🙂 I swear! What’s a stuffy trouser suit as compared to cool starched cotton salwars and sarees?
July 13, 2006 — 7:23 pm
Anonymous says:
a comfort which some of us will thankfully never know ( with sarees at least)
Bharat
July 13, 2006 — 10:07 pm
Lakshmi says:
No one’s preventing you from trying them!
July 14, 2006 — 9:22 pm
Anonymous says:
I did. The scars still show from where the roling pins made their mark.
July 18, 2006 — 3:30 pm
Anonymous says:
a comfort which some of us will thankfully never know ( with sarees at least)
😉
Bharat
July 13, 2006 — 10:08 pm
toubermory says:
You missed Salma Sultan
July 20, 2006 — 1:58 am
Lakshmi says:
And many others as well.
Thanks for reminding!
July 20, 2006 — 7:34 pm