One of my dearest pals visited Goa for a friend’s wedding. He got to Goa by train and it was quite a cramped journey spent huddled on the floor near the toilets. Not so pleasant, obviously. What was pleasant was his encounter with a fellow travelling companion. She was travelling with her parents and my friend spent a good part of the trip chatting with her. She got off earlier than he did and not surprisingly my pal found the rest of the journey boring. He’d written to us about this incident and I remarked that it felt right out of a R K Narayan novel.
What strikes the readers of R K Narayan or Ruskin Bond or O Henry as utterly charming is not the simple prose or the uncomplicated storyline or the realistic characters. To give a background of their writing, (feel free to pitch in, fans), their stories are simple to say the least. Most of the times, the characters are people you can relate to instantly. There are no elaborate plots, no scheming villains, no evil aunts/uncles. Most of Ruskin Bond’s stories are set in the hills of Northern India. He loved the hills, no doubt about it. Even more, he loved the simple people who inhabited these regions. His stories revolve around the harsh lives these people lead, the simple pleasures they have, the beautiful trees dotting the hillside, the myriad birds winging their way across the deodars and the not-so-rare panther streaking across the garden in the night. I have not done justice to this writer’s style but you can get a fair idea of his books. As for R K Narayan, I think most of his stories are set in small towns and villages in Southern India. That’s not strictly true because I have read travelogues penned by him too. In any case, the mainstay of his writing is similar to that of Ruskin Bond’s, only set in another part of small-town India.
But what captivates me and makes me a fan of these authors is the way they have brought to life the strong and invisible thread that binds each one of us. We are more than six billion people on this planet and each person has a world inside his/her own head. We communicate with numerous people outside of us because we have to. We talk to countless people daily, deal with them, interact on various levels. We have various tasks to accomplish and for this purpose, we communicate with these individuals. Therefore, every once in a while, when we step out of these almost-selfish worlds of ours and interact with a complete stranger only to realise that we have this strange, almost invisible bond with him/her, the effect is near-magical. We get talking to this person with no agenda on our minds and then as time passes, we realise that the connections we share are deeper and stronger than we can ever imagine. It’s like ‘There are no strangers in this world, only friends we are yet to meet’. We get a final realization of how we simply cannot do without each other, friends or not.
iswari says:
That’s beautiful! =)
November 20, 2005 — 2:16 pm
Lakshmi says:
Pleasure is mine in writing it…thanks!
November 20, 2005 — 4:34 pm
latelyontime says:
I am not so sure about Bond but Narayan definitely has the knack of telling you your own stories, in a tone so poignant and human that they sound alien to you.
I think it would have been a more fitting Narayan story if your friend realised that she was the bride of the wedding he was attending and this was hre attempt at running away or something like that. Narayan, after all, believed in the power of farce.
November 21, 2005 — 2:50 am
Lakshmi says:
Been a long time since I read any of RK’s works. Left all of them at home in B’bay…:-(
I don’t recall as much about him believing in the power of farce as I do about him being the master of short-story-telling. His attention to detail, as cliched as it sounds, brought every innocuous story to brilliant life.
November 21, 2005 — 12:39 pm
latelyontime says:
For me, Narayan’s genius was in looking at the incongruities of life, at reveling in the oddities that human nature produces, in documenting the completely farcical nature of our dreams, desires and aspirations and the efforts we make to achieve them.
In anybody else’s hand it might have become venomous, but Narayan does not laugh to hurt. He laughs because he is amused. And his brilliance, I think, is in pointing fingers with such a benign smile, that nobody gets hurt.
December 5, 2005 — 10:56 pm
pritygirl says:
i just simply simply simply luuuuurve ruskin bond and rk narayan – not been much into o.henry, but i’m sure his works must be nice too
November 21, 2005 — 3:19 am
Lakshmi says:
You must read O Henry. He is a prolific storyteller.
November 21, 2005 — 12:40 pm
fugney says:
R K Narayan is so realistic I think reading his stuff might depress me these days. It is plain ruthless realism.
November 21, 2005 — 5:57 am
radhika74 says:
agree. Ruskin Bond is a romantic,and i like him the better for it.
November 21, 2005 — 6:46 am
Lakshmi says:
True, RK does seem a mite depressing at times. But some of Bond’s stories also have an air of underlying sadness. Almost as if there is such beauty in Bond’s world that you know it’ll be shortlived…sounds sad, huh?
November 21, 2005 — 12:41 pm
99kanitas says:
‘There are no strangers in this world, only friends we are yet to meet’. We get a final realization of how we simply cannot do without each other, friends or not.
loved that part =D
Never drew parallels between Narayan/Bond and O Henry. But it’s so true – on the personal/people level.
Somehow though, doesn’t it seem as if O Henry’s stories end on a more positive note – a surprise at the end (but a happy end), or that Narayan/Bond’re more poignant (but a bit sad also) – and one thinks – what if… (for all three)
Do you know if Narayan/Bond have ever acknowledged getting inspired by either, or by O Henry?
December 11, 2005 — 9:06 am
99kanitas says:
=D
sorry
read earlier replies
nm
December 11, 2005 — 9:08 am
99kanitas says:
=D
sorry
read earlier replies
nm
December 11, 2005 — 9:08 am
Lakshmi says:
Haven’t heard about either Bond or Narayan being inspired by O Henry.
hey, great to read again from you….:-)
December 12, 2005 — 1:32 pm
Lakshmi says:
Haven’t heard about either Bond or Narayan being inspired by O Henry.
hey, great to read again from you….:-)
December 12, 2005 — 1:32 pm
99kanitas says:
‘There are no strangers in this world, only friends we are yet to meet’. We get a final realization of how we simply cannot do without each other, friends or not.
loved that part =D
Never drew parallels between Narayan/Bond and O Henry. But it’s so true – on the personal/people level.
Somehow though, doesn’t it seem as if O Henry’s stories end on a more positive note – a surprise at the end (but a happy end), or that Narayan/Bond’re more poignant (but a bit sad also) – and one thinks – what if… (for all three)
Do you know if Narayan/Bond have ever acknowledged getting inspired by either, or by O Henry?
December 11, 2005 — 9:06 am