Methinks that I am on a roll; have been putting down a post nearly every other day! Hope this phase lasts; I’ve had enough of that drought of words!
Most of the characters on the telly are really immature. Maybe that’s what makes these sitcoms tick. Watching people make perfect asses of themselves in the most mundane of situations. This includes characters from all the popular sitcoms: Friends, Everybody loves Raymond, Seinfeld and others. Most of these guys act immature when it comes to handling relationships, negative emotions, quirks in others as well as their own selves, issues. They seem to have somewhere gone out of sync with their natural selves. Except for three characters: Joey (Friends), Phoebe (Friends) and Kramer (Seinfeld). I can’t help thinking about how natural these guys are. They are in complete acceptance of their situations, their friends and more importantly, their own selves. They are the only characters who’re totally comfortable in their own skin and it’s been proven on more than a single occasion that Nature supports them. They are creatures, natural and unabashed about themselves and they’ve managed to retain that child-like quality of innocence and enthusiasm which is utterly lovable. Too many people, in the process of growing up, lose these wonderful qualities and turn into jaded cynics, capable of sarcasm and nothing else. It’s one thing to be childish and quite another to be child-like. To possess that kind of curiosity, acceptance and enthusiasm… all the growing-up in the world can be totally traded. It isn’t even as if growing-up amounts to necessarily gaining wisdom. Too often, a grown-up person just knows the *correct* paths to tread, knows the right people to call… Just ends up becoming *worldly-wise* and not really wise. The journey of Return to Innocence is well worth it, I believe.
tomlinsonian says:
FAN-TAS-TIC
Phoebe: I’m flaky, dont mind me.
Joey: If i were omnipoetent, i’d kill myself.
Kramer: Hoochie Mama!
~~~~~
Immortal words…
and perfect analysis..
January 28, 2005 — 8:23 am
Lakshmi says:
Re: FAN-TAS-TIC
Shukran… a decent post after ages! I am happy too!
January 28, 2005 — 9:06 am
splitpeasoup says:
I have to agree.
January 28, 2005 — 8:29 am
Lakshmi says:
Thanks.
January 28, 2005 — 9:06 am
ruchikapoor says:
The journey of Return to Innocence is well worth it, I believe.
My thoughts EXACTLY. Not only do I think it’s well worth it, I also feel the *need* for it every once in a while. And that’s what makes me reread To Kill a Mochingbird and The God of Small Things (please tell me you like it – I’m yet to come across a Malayali who does) again and again and again – they’re almost like therapy for me now!
Oh, and if I haven’t told you already, Dress Your Family in Corduroy and Denim (David Sedaris) is another such delightful book – please try to get it from somewhere and read it….from whatever I know of you, I’m sure you’ll like it.
January 28, 2005 — 6:11 pm
Lakshmi says:
I haven’t read The God of Small things yet. I guess I tend to steer clear of books which are hyped! Explains why I haven’t read Dan Brown’s famous book yet… But yeah, I must give those books a fair chance. I’ll look up the other book too. Thanks, Ruchi…:-)
January 29, 2005 — 8:49 am
ruchikapoor says:
I tend to steer clear of books which are hyped!
Same here. Even I haven’t read The Da Vinci Code. And I read Roy’s book in my final sem of undergrad because we were doing it for this Indian Fiction in English course, and I HAD to read it before we started on it because I knew if I let the prof dissect the whole book apart I wouldn’t be able to enjoy it later.
January 29, 2005 — 2:20 pm
hariputtar says:
⋅ enjoyable posts lately. and noticeably less instances of self-flagellation :)) you raised some good points. artlessness is a wonderful state to be in – phoebe, joey, kramer are like that. [ the flip side is, artlessness may lead to *uncivilized* or thoughtless behaviour at times. 🙂 ]
⋅ sarcasm is wonderful. not enjoyable all the time but wonderful. it gives a wonderful window into a person’s thinking.
⋅ and sometimes i think, complete silence, lack of (the need for) words is better than otherwise. doesnt sri sri say that too 🙂 [ i really cherish my weekend hikes because of the forced silence perhaps 🙂 ]
January 29, 2005 — 1:29 am
Lakshmi says:
Thank you, kind Sir! Was wondering where you were. Terse posts, no comments… Hibernating?
January 29, 2005 — 8:50 am
hariputtar says:
too much work. and then LOTR.
January 29, 2005 — 10:52 am
rileen says:
Yup, you’re on a roll, and yes, i agree that it’s great to be child-like (at least what we suppose child like means, but that’s another discussion) – however, there are two implications of your statements that i find rather curious :
(1)That the ‘natural self’ of everyone is a mature person, and
(2)That Joey and Phoebe are mature.
January 30, 2005 — 10:36 am
Lakshmi says:
Dunno what I can do to clear up your curiosity…:-)
Just something that I feel.
January 31, 2005 — 4:27 am
rileen says:
I find the first highly debatable and the second almost incredible(!), but of course we might as well leave it at that :-p
January 31, 2005 — 5:32 am
Lakshmi says:
but of course we might as well leave it at that :-p
My sentiments totally.
January 31, 2005 — 6:46 am
rileen says:
Very mature *struggles to keep a straight face*.
January 31, 2005 — 6:48 am
Lakshmi says:
Really? I just thought it’d save a lot of time and effort…:-)
January 31, 2005 — 6:50 am
rileen says:
🙂
I was just kidding, and you know it.
Looking forward to the continuaton of the roll you’re on …….
January 31, 2005 — 6:57 am
99kanitas says:
my all-time favorite book
January 31, 2005 — 8:05 pm