well. this has to be a prime example of *courage under fire*, where the subjects of this portrait stood their ground unflinchingly; and in true 007-like tradition, they were … shaken, but not stirred.
That’s a nice interpretation of Hemmingway. Btw, that’s a favourite definition of mine…Oops, mixed it up. I was referring to Hemmingway’s definition of courage as ‘grace under pressure’…!
arunshanbhag says:
L: I think you are at the leading edge of a new genre of photography. Kudos!
August 6, 2004 — 2:00 pm
Lakshmi says:
:-)))
August 9, 2004 — 6:03 am
hariputtar says:
well. this has to be a prime example of *courage under fire*, where the subjects of this portrait stood their ground unflinchingly; and in true 007-like tradition, they were … shaken, but not stirred.
August 6, 2004 — 9:06 pm
Lakshmi says:
That’s a nice interpretation of Hemmingway. Btw, that’s a favourite definition of mine…Oops, mixed it up. I was referring to Hemmingway’s definition of courage as ‘grace under pressure’…!
August 9, 2004 — 6:04 am
deelight says:
Ayoo…I prefer normal photography! This looks like everything is ablaze!
August 6, 2004 — 10:44 pm
Lakshmi says:
Bad pic quality, Dee… that’s it.
August 9, 2004 — 6:05 am
radhika74 says:
hey..i want to see how you look like..post a clear pic,please!
August 6, 2004 — 11:31 pm
Lakshmi says:
🙂 I photograph really bad, Radhika.. Awfully camera-conscious..:-)
August 9, 2004 — 6:05 am